Thursday Three #6

James WrightThis week’s assortment of stuff in triplicate is devoted to one of my favorite poets, James Wright (1927-1980). I first discovered Wright’s words on the forearm of a friend: he had a few lines of Wright’s poetry tattooed in a tidy cursive from elbow to wrist. They were beautiful lines, and I wanted to read more from their author, so I picked up Wright’s Collected Poems and immediately fell in love with his contemplative, compassionate voice—a voice that Wright, born and raised in a shitty midwestern steel mill town, simply referred to as his “Ohioan.” Below, three of Wright’s best:

1. Wright’s most well-known poem is probably “A Blessing,” aka the pony poem. One of the few poems he was able “to get … finished in almost nothing flat,” Wright wrote it after a drive in the Minnesota countryside with his friend Robert Bly. In his essay, “James Wright and the Slender Woman,” Bly recalls the occasion:

James saw two ponies off to the left and said, “Let’s stop.” So we did, and climbed over the fence toward them. We stayed only a few minutes, but they glowed in the dusk, and we could see it. On the way to Minneapolis James wrote in his small spiral notebook the poem he later called “A Blessing.” … In a few passages [in the poem] we feel too much idealization. The two ponies are just ponies, and probably would have bit one of us if we had stayed much longer without giving them sugar. 

The poem may overstate the charms of roadside ponies, but this anthropomorphism also demonstrates one of Wright’s greatest strengths as a poet: his ability to evoke nature as a path to the metaphysical or divine.

A Blessing

Just off the highway to Rochester, Minnesota,
Twilight bounds softly forth on the grass.
And the eyes of those two Indian ponies
Darken with kindness.
They have come gladly out of the willows
To welcome my friend and me.
We step over the barbed wire into the pasture
Where they have been grazing all day, alone.
They ripple tensely, they can hardly contain their happiness
That we have come.
They bow shyly as wet swans. They love each other.
There is no loneliness like theirs.
At home once more,
They begin munching the young tufts of spring in the darkness.
I would like to hold the slenderer one in my arms,
For she has walked over to me
And nuzzled my left hand.
She is black and white,
Her mane falls wild on her forehead,
And the light breeze moves me to caress her long ear
That is delicate as the skin over a girl’s wrist.
Suddenly I realize
That if I stepped out of my body I would break
Into blossom.

2. Wright pays terrific attention to rhythm. In a Paris Review interview, he says, “I wouldn’t say that I’m a frustrated musician, but I love music and I think this is why I usually begin a poem that way. Music has given me a much greater sense of the possibilities of quantity in poetry.” So why read when you can listen? Here’s Wright reciting “Lying in a Hammock at William Duffy’s Farm in Pine Island, Minnesota.”

3. My favorite of Wright’s collections is Shall We Gather at the River (1969). In the Paris Review interview, Wright has this to say about the book:

I was trying to move from death to resurrection and death again, and challenge death finally. Well, if I must tell you, I was trying to write about a girl I was in love with who has been dead for a long time. I tried to sing with her in that book. Not to recreate her; you can’t recreate anybody, at least I can’t. But I thought maybe I could come to terms with that feeling which has hung on in my heart for so long. The book has been damned because it is so carefully dreamed.

“To the Muse,” the poem whose last three lines are etched on my friend’s forearm, is the final poem in the collection:

To the Muse

It is all right. All they do
Is go in by dividing
One rib from another. I wouldn’t
Lie to you. It hurts
Like nothing I know. All they do
Is burn their way in with a wire.
It forks in and out a little like the tongue
Of that frightened garter snake we caught
At Cloverfield, you and me, Jenny
So long ago.

I would lie to you
If I could.
But the only way I can get you to come up
Out of the suckhole, the south face
Of the Powhatan pit, is to tell you
What you know:

You come up after dark, you poise alone
With me on the shore.
I lead you back to this world.

Three lady doctors in Wheeling open
Their offices at night.
I don’t have to call them, they are always there.
But they only have to put the knife once
Under your breast.
Then they hang their contraption.
And you bear it.

It’s awkward a while. Still, it lets you
Walk about on tiptoe if you don’t
Jiggle the needle.
It might stab your heart, you see.
The blade hangs in your lung and the tube
Keeps it draining.
That way they only have to stab you
Once. Oh Jenny.

I wish to God I had made this world, this scurvy
And disastrous place. I
Didn’t, I can’t bear it
Either, I don’t blame you, sleeping down there
Face down in the unbelievable silk of spring,
Muse of black sand,
Alone.

I don’t blame you, I know
The place where you lie.
I admit everything. But look at me.
How can I live without you?
Come up to me, love,
Out of the river, or I will
Come down to you.

The Voynich Enigma

The Voynich manuscript is a fifteenth-century document consisting of 240 pages of very peculiar drawings and screeds of incomprehensible text. It comes from Europe, most likely northern Italy, and radiocarbon testing has established that the manuscript’s vellum dates from between 1404-1438. No one knows who wrote and illustrated the book; it takes its name from antiquarian Wilfrid Voynich, who rediscovered it in the library of a Jesuit college near Rome in 1912. Over the centuries the manuscript has had a number of documented owners, including Roman Emperor Rudolph II and a seventeenth-century Bohemian alchemist called Georg Baresch, but by the time Voynich found it, it had been missing for nearly 250 years.

Voynich

No one has ever been able to read the manuscript: the text does not match any known language, and scholars have never found any other instances of the script. Statistical analysis shows that the text has patterns similar to those of known languages, but there are some intriguing differences: for example, unlike most languages, “Voynichese” has very few two-letter words, and the words that appear most frequently are on the longer side (and yet, also unusually, there are no words longer than ten glyphs).

Voynich Text

The inscrutability of the text has given rise to countless theories. Some scholars suggest the manuscript is written in code, but no one can determine what language it might be based on (Hebrew and Latin are popular contenders), and no one has ever been able to crack the code. Other Voynich boffins claim it’s a straightforward text written in a ‘lost’ language, with early Welsh and Nahuatl, a language of the Aztecs, being just two of the candidates. There’s also the possibility that the entire document is an elaborate prank—a sixteenth-century Sokal-type hoax designed to poke fun at the alchemical texts of the time. Finally, it wouldn’t be a properly spooky mystery without a few nutbars insisting on alien involvement.

The artwork is as odd as the text. There are 113 drawings of unidentified plant species; numerous diagrams of a seemingly astronomical nature; and, most bizarrely, lots of sketches of little ladies, including “nude females emerging from pipes or chimneys” and “a biological section containing a myriad of drawings of miniature female nudes, most with swelled abdomens, immersed or wading in fluids and oddly interacting with interconnecting tubes and capsules.”

Voynich Picture

Yup. WEIRD. I love how so much of it looks so sensible. The plants look like plants that must surely exist… but they don’t. And the script looks so familiar—maybe if you squinted your eyes just so, it would all become utterly legible? And yet: TINY LADIES INTERACTING WITH TUBES.

Voynich Picture

Hmm. Your guess is as good as mine. A language lost to time? An impenetrable cipher? Or just some bored Renaissance prankster with a thing for botany and nudey pics? I’m going to bet my whimsical nickel on a Lost World theory—it’s an ancient Lonely Planet guide to some island that has long since sunk into the sea, an island where the flora was lush and the womenfolk liked to gallivant in giant tubs of green goop.

Voynich Pictures

The original document is currently housed in Yale’s Beinecke Library, and the entire manuscript has been made available online. If you enjoy amateur cryptography—or just like looking at old pictures of plants and naked people—it’s well worth checking out.

And on a somewhat related note, if you like mysteries involving codes, one of the most compelling is Australia’s 1948 ‘Tamám shud’ case, which features an unidentified man found dead on an Adelaide beach with a cryptic message hidden in his pocket; the possibility of poison; a little Cold War intrigue; and a rare New Zealand copy of The Rubaiyat. There’s a fascinating account of the story here.

Best of BookExpo

The makeover of Malvern Books is now under way. Here’s another Before shot, featuring our pair of oh-so-structural poles.

Poles

The poles are doing a smashing job of keeping the ceiling and the floor apart, but they’re not much to look at, so we plan to hide them inside a couple of bonny book displays. Good riddance, tiny poles.

Meanwhile—here comes the most whimsical segue ever—two non-structural members of Malvern Books spent a few days last week in New York, strolling the plushly carpeted aisles of BookExpo, aka “the largest publishing event in North America.” BookExpo is an annual Javits Center shindig in which over a thousand bookish businesses show off their wares, from massive publishing conglomerates giving out advance copies of their latest Outlandishly Daft Diet (Reset Your Body With Cheese!) to some dude flogging his self-published memoir, Gout. There are also lectures, readings, autographing events, and an abundance of sideline displays. (Sidelines are those vaguely reading-related items booksellers situate near the counter—bookmarks, Kafka mints, Virginia Woolf finger puppets—in the hopes that drunken impulse purchasing will keep their store afloat.)

A few BookExpo 2013 highlights:

  • We met heaps of lovely people and presses. Our basic plan of attack was to wander into as many booths as possible, say “Hello! We’re opening a bookstore that sells poetry and literary fiction!”, and then see what happened. What usually happened was that the people in the booth said (1) “You’re mad!” and/or (2) “Yay!” (One man said, “You’re opening an independent bookstore? My god, you’re a unicorn!”) Then they showed us their books. And gave us catalogs. And business cards. And candy. All of which was quite wonderful. Stacey at City Lights Books and Ruth at Edelweiss deserve a special mention for being extraordinarily awesome and informative. And we’re excited to soon be placing (mammoth) orders with excellent indie presses like Talonbooks, Bellevue Literary Press, Other Press, and Biblioasis. They produce smart, stunning, inventive literature that we’ll be proud to have on our shelves.
  • We stuffed our tote bags with so many fantastic books. Among the many advance reading copies we picked up, Sylvain Tesson’s The Consolations of the Forest and Peter Mattei’s The Deep Whatsis look especially interesting. And in the Out Now! category, we’re excited to read Dina Del Bucchia’s Coping with Emotions and Otters, a poetry collection that wins the Best Title Ever award and promises to be a little wicked and very, very funny.
  • TattooWe got a glitter tattoo. While sober! Malvern Books likes pirates—who doesn’t?!—so we requested a picture of a sparkly marauder. The photo at right shows the finished, ahem, design. When a woman at the drugstore spots your pirate tattoo and says “nice spaceship!”… well, that’s when you know you don’t have a very good pirate tattoo. Worth noting: glitter tattoos last for two days, and those two days will feel like an eternity.
  • We met Grumpy Cat! OMG, ROFL, etc. Yes, we queued for forty-five minutes to have our photo taken with an Internet Cat (real name: Tardar Sauce). She was at BookExpo to drum up publicity for her book, a mildly amusing compendium of “disgruntled tips and activities designed to put a frown on your face.” She refused to sign autographs and patting was expressly forbidden, but each fan was allowed to quickly bend down and have their picture taken with Grumps as she slumbered in her furry pod. The event was late on Friday afternoon, shortly after the blokes at McSweeney’s started handing out bubbly to celebrate their fifteenth anniversary, so the queue was quite… jolly. And when we finally got to briefly hover over her royal grumpiness, well, it all seemed like the best possible use of an hour. She appeared heavily sedated and yet absolutely furious at the same time, which you have to admit is a fairly tremendous talent.

Grumpy Cat BEA

Stocking Up

Please pardon our brief silence here at Malvern Books, but we’ve been terribly busy making lists. You see, while it’s possible to fill the shelves of your soon-to-open store by asking a friendly book distributor to send you their “starter kit”—presumably a bunch of bog standard* best sellers they ship to every new retailer—we decided we wanted to pick each and every title ourselves…

bookshelfYep. Every single book. Spreadsheets at the ready, book nerds! Making a list of thousands of awesome indie and small press books is immensely fun, of course (and there’s so much good stuff to choose from), but it’s also rather time-consuming. And we’re hoping to finalize most of our selections before we head to next week’s BookExpo in New York.

In the meantime, I heartily recommend you check out these fantastic presses we’ve encountered on our Excel(lent) adventures: Calamari Press for irreverent contemporary fiction; Ugly Duckling Presse for beautiful poetry in beautiful packages; Pushkin Press for classics from around the world; and Tam Tam Books for “lost masterpieces.”

* I was curious about the origins of this idiom and whether Americans use it, so I googled it and found myself at the website of this excellent campaign. Whoever came up with the name for this, ahem, movement deserves a medal.

Thursday Three #5

In today’s Thursday Three, our weekly assortment of oddities in triplicate, we give you a brief introduction to three of the best writing guides.

1. Perfectionism your problem? Scared to ruin that astounding paragraph in your head by daring to write it down? Silly fool! Anne Lamott has this to say to you:

LamottPerfectionism is the voice of the oppressor, the enemy of the people. It will keep you cramped and insane your whole life, and it is the main obstacle between you and a shitty first draft. I think perfectionism is based on the obsessive belief that if you run carefully enough, hitting each stepping-stone just right, you won’t have to die. The truth is that you will die anyway and that a lot of people who aren’t even looking at their feet are going to do a whole lot better than you, and have a lot more fun while they’re doing it.

Lamott’s Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life is the perfect kick in the pants for those of us who have trouble with the actual writing-stuff-down part of writing. Lamott is down to earth and inspiring, and her humor, compassion, and good-natured crankiness somehow make the pen-to-paper business feel less like torture and more like fun—urgent, essential fun.

2. In The War of Art, Steven Pressfield suggests that writerly procrastination can be blamed on a force he calls Resistance:

War of ArtResistance cannot be seen, touched, heard, or smelled. But it can be felt. We experience it as an energy field radiating from a work-in-potential. It’s a repelling force. Its aim is to shove us away, distract us, prevent us from doing our work … Resistance will tell you anything to keep you from doing your work … Resistance has no strength of its own. Every ounce of juice it possesses comes from us. We feed it with power by our fear of it.

This all sounds rather dramatic, but Pressfield’s notion of Resistance will feel familiar to many aspiring writers—and viewing one’s mundane daily struggle to write as a minor skirmish in an epic, ongoing battle against Resistance is… kind of fun. The final third of the book gets a bit mystical and dippy (“I plan on using terms like muses and angels. Does that make you uncomfortable?” Why yes, yes it does!), but the first two-thirds of The War of Art may just make a writing warrior out of you.

3. John Gardner’s The Art of Fiction is for those of you who have conquered perfectionism and procrastination and are now going about the messy business of making sentences. Gardner sees fiction as the creation of a dream in the reader’s mind:

Art of FictionWe may observe, first, that if the effect of the dream is to be powerful, the dream must … be vivid and continuous—vivid because if we are not quite clear about what it is we’re dreaming, who and where the characters are, what it is that they’re doing or trying to do and why, our emotions and judgements must be confused, dissipated, or blocked; and continuous because a repeatedly interrupted flow of action must necessarily have less force than an action directly carried through from its beginning to its conclusion.

Drawing on examples from Homer to Updike, Gardner demonstrates the various ways in which writers have created these dreams in the minds of readers. He addresses practical issues of craft, including point of view, sentence structure, voice, and rhythm, and his chapter on common errors—mistakes that “snap” the reader out of the fictional dream—should be essential reading for all would-be novelists. He’s particularly harsh on writers who use fancy-pants Latinate terms where Anglo-Saxon ones would do; if your story features an “inhospitable abode” instead of, say, a desert of rocks and sand, well, there’s probably no hope for you.

Lows and Highs

A glorious day here at Malvern Books! Remember the carpet? The terrible, terrible carpet? Well, it’s gone!

Before

Good riddance, oh chunderous tapestry of doom! The place is looking a little bare now, but we’ve already picked out some snazzy new flooring, and we very much look forward to celebrating its installation in the customary way: by taking off our socks and shoes and running madly around the room, crying, “Eeeee! So soft! So clean!” For those of you who enjoy the word swatches, here is the word swatches, and also (again!) swatches of our imminent flooring:

Carpet

With the floor taken care of, it’s now time to raise our eyes to the roof. The good people of Austin take roof accessorizing very seriously. Here, for example, is the friendly chap who lives above the nearby Wheatsville Co-op:

Roof

And not to be outdone in the stuff-of-nightmare stakes, Atomic Tattoo crown their store with this octopus/dead guy combo:

Atomic Tattoo Sign

We want to do our bit to keep the Austin skyline spooky, so we’re thinking we’ll go with a sculpture of a giant pterodactyl, wearing glasses, reading a book, while perched upon a globe. What say you, Malvernians?